The sensor resolution of the RX100 III and the RX100 VII are quite similar, and the sensor size of both cameras are the same (see table below) (1″). 69 distinct specifications, the current market price, and DxO Mark ratings are used in our Decision Algorithm to dynamically rate cameras, allowing for a more objective and consistent comparison. Considering that both the Sony RX100 VII and the Sony RX100 III feature 1′′-sized 20.0 MP resolution sensors, the size and resolution of the sensor is not a distinguishing factor between these two cameras. The magnifications of the viewfinders of both cameras are shown in this infographic. Compared to normal size, the black area indicates a magnification of 1x; the red region represents a magnification of 0.85x, which is the greatest value available in any camera on the market at the time of writing.

The Screen and Viewfinder of the Sony Rx100 III against the Sony Rx100 Vii

When it comes to features, we’re searching for more parallels than differences once again. Although the bodies are made of strong aluminum, their control layouts are similar, with no obvious variation in size or weight between them. The fact that all four of them are devoid of any form of grip does not sit well with everyone, although alternative grips are available Sony Cyber shot DSC RX100 VII vs Sony Cyber shot DSC RX100 III for those who fall into this category.

Comparison of Characteristics

It is possible to obtain a general overview of the connectivity of the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VII in the table below. The connectivity of the cameras is illustrated in the table below, which highlights the interfaces the cameras provide for accessory control and data transfer. As a starting point for the comparison, the following is a high-level summary of the major specifications of the two cameras. Be aware that the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera varies based on the lens that is currently being used by the user. The following is a side-by-side comparison of the RX100 III and the RX100 VII in terms of front-view dimensions. Both cameras include tilting displays, which allow you to adjust the angle of the screen to make it simpler to film from waist or above-the-head positions. This comparison will be between the Sony RX100 VII and the Sony RX100 III, both of which are Large Sensor Compact cameras.

Slow-motion film may also be captured with the RX100 III, but only at a frame rate of 120 frames per second, with the movie being broadcast at 720p. Considering that these aren’t among the most inexpensive cameras available, examining where the models are similar and where they vary can help you choose which makes the most sense for your needs and budget. The Sony RX100 III and Sony RX100 VII have impressive features, but do they rank among the best cameras in their respective classes? Find out whether the two cameras are among the best in the business in the most recent Best Travel-Zoom Camera ranking, which is updated weekly. When it comes to storing image data, both the RX100 III and the RX100 VII write their files to SDXC or Memory Stick PRO Duo cards, which are both available for purchase.

When compared to the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II small camera delivers a few notable improvements, but it comes at a greater cost. With the RX100, Sony completely reimagined the premium point-and-shoot camera category in 2012. It has continued to expand the series’ offerings while still keeping previous versions on the market. “The Sony RX100 VI 20MP small camera with mm zoom has been revealed, with a suggested retail price of $1,200.” Unfortunately, because of the large number of RX100 series cameras on the market, as well as the wide range of cost and feature options available, it has become more difficult for prospective purchasers to discern the primary distinctions between these cameras.

Our readers will benefit from the following two tables, which depict each generation of the Sony RX100 cameras, along with its main characteristics. We had to divide the table into two sections since there was just too much material to put into a single column of text. Please keep in mind that we have highlighted the better features in a deeper blue color, while the essential missing aspects have been highlighted in a light red color. Throughout the series, the cameras have been improved and new features have been introduced, making the RX100 series cameras among the most engaging cameras available on the market. Despite the fact that all three cameras share the same NP-BX1 battery, the older RX100 III has the longest battery life of the bunch, with 320 photos per charge. The RX100 III is the only one of the five cameras we tested that does not provide the ability to select the minimum shutter speed while using Auto ISO, which is a valuable function that is featured in the other four cameras.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III small camera receives Editors’ Choice recognition for its picture quality and superb electronic viewfinder, despite the fact that it is somewhat expensive. This camera makes use of the “Column-Parallel A/D Conversion Technique” to produce more detailed pictures in low light circumstances than smaller-sensor cameras do in normal lighting. We’re seeing the process of evolution in action, as various “features” are being added to the camera that do not much enhance its utility, but do significantly raise its cost.

However, if you are just looking for a reliable point-and-shoot camera, I would recommend checking into the models from the previous generation. The newest RX 100 VII camera, like its predecessor, is equipped with a mm equivalent lens, which provides greater reach than prior generation RX100 series cameras. Keep in mind, however, that this comes at the penalty of a slower maximum aperture – f/2.8-f/4.5 as opposed to f/1.8-f/2.8 on the prior III-VA models – and poorer ISO sensitivity. Sony claims that the new optical image stabilization (OIS) system is outstanding, so it’s possible that the camera will perform better in low-light circumstances.